For the PDF version, CLICK HERE
For the Podcast, CLICK HERE
Question:
Is there any evidence that the homeopathic medicine, Oscillococcinum (Anas barbariae hepatis et cordis extractum
200CK HPUS) is effective at preventing or treating swine-origin influenza A
(H1N1) viral infections?
Answer:
Part 1. The recent emergence and global impact
of the swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus along with the knowledge that
available methods for prevention and treatment are limited has raised concerns
about how we will be able to offer preventative therapies and/or treatment to
those in need should the situation worsen. While the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
recommend oseltamivir (Tamiflu®) and zanamivir (Relenza®) as effective
therapies, worldwide supply is not sufficient to offer prophylaxis or treatment
to everyone.(1,2) In
addition, there are a number of people that will not take treatments that are
not "natural" or that are known to be synthetic/prescription medications. As such, the use of natural, herbal or
homeopathic treatments thought to be active against swine-origin influenza A
(H1N1) viral infections are likely to increase and are now being advocated by a
number of non-medical sources found on the internet. One such homeopathic medicine being recommended is
Oscillococcinum (Anas barbariae hepatis
et cordis extractum 200CK HPUS).(3)
Oscillococcinum is a patented homeopathic medicine that is in the form of granules and is manufactured primarily by Boiron Laboratories.(3) Prior to the emergence of the swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) or avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses, Oscillococcinum was reported to be used by over 1,000 United Kingdom physicians, and 10,000 French and German homeopathic physicians for influenza infections (flu).(4) Are there any efficacy data regarding the use of Oscillococcinum for the prevention or treatment of the flu?
Two separate
systematic reviews have been done and will help answer this question. One was done by the Cochrane
Collaboration specifically on Oscillococcinum and another by a group from the
United Kingdom that included Oscillococcinum in its systematic analysis.(4,5) Both groups came to similar
findings. The Cochrane
Collaboration included a total of 7 trials in their review of which 3 were
prevention trials representing 2,265 participants and 4 were treatment trials
representing 1,194 participants.
Of these trials only 2 studies had sufficient information to complete
the full data extraction. They
found that there was no evidence that Oscillococcinum can prevent influenza
(relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28 - 1.43).(4) As it related to the treatment of the
flu, Oscillococcinum reduced the length of the influenza illness by 0.28 days
(95% CI, 0.5 - 0.06).(4)
This translates into participants taking Oscillococcinum experiencing an
average reduction in duration of illness by only 6 hours, with a range of 1
hour to 12 hours of benefit.(4)
This conclusion was consistent among both systematic analyses and while
it is statistically significant, this is of debatable clinical significance.(4,5) This is especially true given the poor
standards used by these trials in reporting data.(4) In fact, several of the studies never
made it to full publication and one was published in a general medical magazine
versus a scientific journal.(4)
Fortunately, there are no known major side effects associated with its
use.
Is Oscillococcinum regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration? Yes.
Homeopathic medicines meeting certain criteria are regulated by the FDA.(6) However, it is important to note that
the trials used in these systematic reviews and data published to date do not
include any scientific evidence for use of Oscillococcinum for the prophylaxis
or treatment of the current swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) flu. In addition, the current CDC
recommendations for prevention and treatment against the current strains of the
H1N1 virus do not include Oscillococcinum as a recommended option. As such, its use for the prevention or
treatment of the current H1N1 strain cannot be recommended and should not be
used in place of other standard treatments that have supporting scientific
information.
What is the mechanism by which Oscillococcinum may offer this
potential small benefit in the treatment of the flu and what is important for
clinicians to know? The process of how Oscillococcinum is made and its mechanism
action will be addressed in part 2 of this series.
(PW Nat Med Newsl
2009;1(17):1-4.) ©2009 Pharmacology Weekly, Inc.
Take Home Points:
1. The use of natural, herbal or homeopathic treatments thought to
be active against swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) viral infections is likely to
increase and are now being advocated by a number of non-medical sources found
on the internet. One such
homeopathic medicine being recommended by some non-medical authorities is
Oscillococcinum (Anas barbariae hepatis
et cordis extractum 200CK HPUS).
2. A systematic review of 7 trials by the Cochrane Collaboration
concluded that there is no evidence that Oscillococcinum prevents influenza
illness. In addition, the Cochran
Collaboration and a group out of the United Kingdom concluded that participants
who took Oscillococcinum experienced a reduction in duration of illness of 6
hours, with a range of 1 hour to 12 hours of benefit.
3. It is important to note that the trials used in these systematic
reviews and data published to date, do not include any scientific evidence for
use of Oscillococcinum for the prophylaxis or treatment of the current
swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) flu.
Considerations for Clinicians Based on Setting:
Outpatient Setting:
Since Oscillococcinum can be purchased over the counter and on
the internet, it would be important for all clinicians to know that this
homeopathic treatment is not only being advocated by some non-medical or
non-scientific authorities, but patients may inquire about its safety and
efficacy should the current or future influenza infections get worse. It would also be important for
clinicians to assess the personal beliefs and desires regarding various
treatment options so that treatment plans can be adjusted accordingly.
Inpatient Setting:
The above information from the outpatient setting is also
applicable, especially if a patient is discharged from the hospital on standard
treatment which is known to be effective and recommended by medical authorities
for the prophylaxis and/or treatment of the swine-origin influenza A (H1N1)
virus. Adherence to this regimen
could be influenced by the patients underlying knowledge of various treatment
options and/or personal beliefs regarding the use of prescription medications.
Important
Counseling Bullet Point(s):
It would be most important for clinicians to counsel their
patients about the lack of objective and well designed clinical trials
evaluating the safety and efficacy of Oscillococcinum for regular influenza
illness as well as the prevention or treatment of swine-origin influenza A
(H1N1) viral infections. In
addition, patients should be advised to immediately begin and complete
treatment regimens prescribed to them not only for their own health but for the
health of those in their communities.
Medical/Legal Consideration(s):
There were no cases identified in the 2008 edition of
LexisNexis' Drugs in Litigation regarding Oscillococcinum or products liability
claims against the drug manufacturer, and Pharmacology Weekly's legal counsel
has not identified any such cases to date.(7) Nevertheless, several peer-reviewed
scientific publications have shown that there is no definitive evidence for the
use of Oscillococcinum in the prevention and/or treatment of influenza illness
(and more specifically the swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) viral infection) it
would be prudent to document in the medical chart that an inquiring patient has
been advised that the use of this homeopathic treatment is not currently
recommended as a substitute to currently recommended options such as
oseltamivir and zanamivir.
Test Questions for CE:
Which of the
following is the active ingredient of Oscillococcinum?
a. Sambucus nigra
b. Anas barbariae
hepatis et cordis extractum 200CK HPUS
c. Panax quinquefolium
d. Andrographis
paniculata
Which of the
following best represents the average reduction in duration of influenza
illness experienced by patients taking Oscillococcinum?
a. 6 hours
b. 24 hours
c. 36 hours
d. 48 hours
True or False: Oscillococcinum has not been studied in
patients with the current swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) viral infection.
a. True
b. False
Pharmacology
Weekly, Inc. is an accredited provider for continuing medical education (CME)
by the American Academy of Continuing Medical Education (AACME) and this
newsletter is worth 0.25 hours of category 1 CME for those subscribers with
access to CE.
Medical Director: Gregory C.
McKeever, MD
Editor-in-Chief:
Anthony J. Busti, PharmD, BCPS, FNLA, FAHA
Board Members & Reviewers: Donald S. Nuzum, PharmD; Brooke J. Daves,
JD
Disclosures of Conflict of Interest: None
Issue Citation:
Busti AJ, Nuzum DS,
Daves BJ, McKeever GC. Is there
any evidence that the homeopathic medicine, Oscillococcinum (Anas barbariae hepatis et cordis extractum
200CK HPUS) is effective at preventing or treating swine-origin influenza A
(H1N1) viral infections? PW
Nat Med Newsl 2009;1(17):1-4.
References:
1. Busti AJ, Margolis DM, Herrington J,
Nuzum DS, Daves BJ, McKeever GC.
How can the antiviral, oseltamivir (Tamiflu®) work to treat swine-origin
influenza A strain (H1N1) viral infection? PW Pharmacother Newsl
2009;1(16):1-4. Pharmacology
Weekly
2. Center for Disease Control and
Prevention. H1N1 Flu (Swine Flu)
and You. Accessed: May 12, 2009
at: http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/qa.htm
3. Boiron. Oscillococcinum. Newtown Square, PA. Accessed on May 12, 2009 at: Click
here
4. Vickers AJ, Smith C. Homeopathic Oscillococcinum for
preventing and treating influenza and influenza-like syndromes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;3:CD001957. PubMed
5. Guo R,
Pittler MH, Ernst E. Complementary
medicine for treating or preventing influenza or influenza-like illness. Am J Med 2007;120:923-929.e3.
PubMed
6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Sec 400.400 Conditions Under Which Homeopathic Drugs May be Marketed (CPG
7132.15). Accessed on 5/12/09.
Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ora/compliance_ref/cpg/cpgdrg/cpg400-400.html
7. Patterson RM, Hoyle PC, Editorial
Staff of the Publishers of Lawyers' Medical Cyclopedia eds. Drugs
in Litigation: Damage Awards Involving Prescription and Nonprescription Drugs. 2008 Edition. LexisNexis. San
Francisco, CA.
©2009 Pharmacology
Weekly, Inc.
P.O. Box 719
Salado, Texas 76571
www.pharmacologyweekly.com
All
rights reserved. Pharmacology Weekly, Inc. is a Texas corporation,
advised by healthcare providers who provide unbiased education regarding the
relevance of pharmacology in generally accepted practices. This
newsletter is sent out to active subscribers weekly, and any and all use of
this newsletter is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Pharmacology Weekly,
as set forth on the pharmacologyweekly.com website. If you are receiving
this newsletter without a subscription, such transmission to you is in
violation of such Terms and Conditions, and the sender could be subject to
civil liability for such violation of Pharmacology Weekly's intellectual
property rights. Please notify Pharmacology Weekly immediately of such person's
violation of the Terms and Conditions. You, too, may be subject to such civil
liability should you continue to receive such newsletters without purchasing a
subscription or should you forward this newsletter to someone else.
No part of this material may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in
any way whatsoever without written permission from the President of
Pharmacology Weekly. The editors rely primarily on peer-reviewed,
published medical information and on the opinions of the editorial staff and
independent peer-reviewers. All education and recommendations are
considered to be educational and not meant to apply to specific patients. The
above information should be used appropriately in the context of the provider's
legal role as a healthcare provider in their respective state or country.
Pharmacology Weekly does not accept responsibility for the application of this
information in direct or indirect patient care. It is the responsibility
of the healthcare provider to ascertain the Food and Drug Administration status
of each drug and to check the product information provided by the manufacturer
of each drug for any changes. The editors and authors have made every
effort to provide accurate and complete information and shall not be held
responsible for any damage from any error, possible omission, or inaccuracy. To
the extent this newsletter provides information on legal issues, it is not
intended to provide advice on any specific legal matter or factual situation.
This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not
constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this
information without seeking professional legal counsel.
|
|