For the PDF version, CLICK HERE
For the Podcast, CLICK HERE
Question:
How do genetic polymorphisms to UGT1A1*28 increase the risk for life-threatening neutropenia when receiving irinotecan (Camptosar®)?
Answer:
It is well known that the chemotherapeutic regimen of irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar®) in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin is an effective treatment for one of the most common forms of cancer in the western world, metastatic colorectal carcinoma.1 Like many chemotherapeutic agents, irinotecan is known to cause a number of adverse drug events (ADE). Of greatest concern is the development of severe myelosuppression (in particular neutropenia) that may be life-threatening. Patients at greatest risk for this are those over the age of 65, those having previously received pelvic/abdominal irradiation, patients with low performance status, and patients heterozygous (TA6/TA7) or homozygous (TA7/TA7) for UGT1A1*28 allele.1,2 What does heterozygous and homozygous mean? Since all humans have 2 copies of a gene coding sequence (or allele), a person is heterozygous if they carry 1 copy of the normal gene and 1 copy of the mutant gene and are homozygous if they have two identical copies of the mutant gene (or gene variation).3 It is this genetic polymorphism (or variation) or risk factor that is the focus of this newsletter issue. It is estimated that approximately 10% of the North American population is homozygous for this allele.1 So what role does UGT1A1*28 polymorphism play in causing irinotecan-induced myelosuppression?

When cells replicate, each strand of their DNA is copied. In order to prevent "knotting" of the unwinding DNA, topoisomerase I is present to relieve torsional strain on the negative supercoiled DNA and to help reconnect the broken DNA strands.3 Without topoisomerase I, DNA replication and cell division would cease and the cell would be rendered dysfunctional and die. Thus, functional topoisomerase I is highly desirable for unregulated, rapidly replicating cancer cells. Irinotecan and its main active metabolite, SN-38, bind to topoisomerase I-DNA complex impairing division of cancer cells.4 Normally irinotecan is metabolized to its active and lipophilic metabolite, SN-38, which is known to be about 1,000 more potent at inhibiting topoisomerase I than its parent drug.1,4 As such, anything that prevents the metabolism or elimination of SN-38 can have a profound impact on cell division and lead to pronounced toxicities. SN-38 is metabolized via glucuronidation to SN-38G by uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) to a more water soluble metabolite that is readily available for renal elimination. UGT1A1 is the enzyme primarily responsible for the conversion of SN-38 to SN-38G. In addition, UGT1 is responsible for conjugating bilirubin. Unfortunately, UGT1A1 is subject to genetic polymorphisms that can directly impact its gene expression resulting in both a decreased availability for metabolizing irinotecan and familial unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia diseases such as Gilbert's syndrome and Crigler-Najjar syndrome types I and II.5. It appears that UGT1A1*28 polymorphism results in the promoter region of a gene coding sequence that has a greater number (TA7/TA7 or TA6/TA7) of TA (thymine and adenine) repeats than normal (TA6/TA6) wild-type patients.7 This directly affects the ability of RNA polymerase binding to the promoter region just prior to the gene coding sequence of interest and thereby prevents the gene from being transcribed and produced.3 Therefore, patients with UGT1A1*28 make less UGT1A1 than normal patients and thus cannot efficiently metabolize the potent irinotecan metabolite, SN-38.1,2 As a result, a more profound inhibition of DNA replication occurs. Since the bone marrow is a place for both continual white blood cell replication and turnover, these cells (in addition to the cancer cells) are significantly impacted.1,2 The prevalence of developing grade 4 neutropenia (neutrophil count < 1000 cells/microliter) has been reported to be 50% in TA7/TA7 patients and 12.5% in TA6/TA7 patients for UGT1A1*28.2 It is apparent that other risk factors or variables also contribute to the risk of developing neutropenia since the prevalence is not 100%. These other variables will be covered in a future newsletter.
Fortunately, there are now genetic tests that can be done to determine a patient's genotype (genetic makeup or profile) for various genes to determine if there are variations compared to the norm. One example of an FDA-approved test is the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay by Third Wave Technologies.8 This test is recommended by the manufacturer and can be used in clinical practice to determine if the patient will require a dose reduction for irinotecan. Lastly, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical guidelines for the treatment of colon cancer state, "Irinotecan should be used with caution and with decreased doses in patients with Gilbert's disease or elevated serum bilirubin. There is a commercially available test for UGT1A1. Guidelines for use in clinical practice have not been established." 6
(PW Pharmacogenet Newsl 2009;1(4):1-4.) ©2009 Pharmacology Weekly, Inc.
Take Home Points:
It is well known that irinotecan (CPT-11) is a chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma and that irinotecan is associated with severe myelosuppression (in particular neutropenia).
Irinotecan and its main active metabolite, SN-38, bind to topoisomerase I-DNA complex preventing cellular replication. SN-38 is more than 1,000 times more potent at inhibiting this step in replication than irinotecan.
The active metabolite, SN-38, is primarily metabolized (or glucuronidated) by UGT1A1 to facilitate elimination from the body. Patients with the genetic polymorphism (or variation) UGT1A1*28 will have a decreased ability to metabolize or glucuronidate SN-38, thereby exposing themselves to greater inhibition of cell division. This can result in life-threatening myelosuppression.
Pharmacogenetic testing is FDA-approved and is being used in clinical practice to determine a patient's candidacy for and/or need for dose reduction with irinotecan.
Considerations for Clinicians Based on Setting:
Outpatient Setting:
Due to the specific indication for the use of irinotecan and its intravenous route of administration, this medication is predominantly used in an oncology infusion clinic. However, it would be prudent to do pharmacogenetic testing prior to administration of irinotecan given the severity of neutropenia that may result if the patient is homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 allele. Patients should receive a baseline white blood count and bilirubin assessment to ensure levels are acceptable prior to initiation of irinotecan therapy. Irinotecan should be administered with extreme caution in patients with elevated serum bilirubin levels at baseline.
Inpatient Setting:
If a patient receiving irinotecan has been admitted to the hospital for febrile neutropenia, testing the patient for the UGT1A1*28 allele should be considered to determine the etiology and whether or not therapy should be continued in future. However, similar to what the clinicians may do if the test returned positive, they may forgo genetic testing and simply choose to reduce the dose according the manufacturer's recommendations.
Important Counseling Bullet Point(s):
Patients should be given adequate counseling to monitor for the signs and symptoms of infection or neutropenia such as (but not limited to): fever, new onset shortness of breath, sore throat, shaking, chills, unusual fatigue, diarrhea and to notify their physician or oncologist immediately. It would also be prudent to recommend avoiding purposeful contact with anyone who is ill.
Medical/Legal Consideration(s):
There were no cases identified in the 2008 edition of LexisNexis' Drugs in Litigation regarding irinotecan. Although such claims against healthcare providers and/or manufacturers have not occurred to date, because of the risk of severe and life-threatening neutropenia when given to the wrong patient medical professionals should be cautious in prescribing such medications and document appropriate risk factor assessment and counseling of the patient in the medical chart.9 According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical guidelines for the treatment of colon cancer, "Irinotecan should be used with caution in patients with Gilbert's disease or elevated serum bilirubin. There is a commercially available test for UGT1A1. Guidelines for use in clinical practice have not been established." 6
Test Questions for CE:
Irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar®) is primarily indicated for the treatment of which condition?
a. Diabetes mellitus
b. Metastatic skin cancer
c. HIV infection
d. Colorectal cancer
Which of the following is the main metabolite of irinotecan?
a. SN-38
b. T20
c. 3A4
d. SN-21
What side effect is a patient at greatest risk of developing if they are homozygous for UGT1A1*28 and receiving irinotecan?
a. Congestive heart failure
b. Depression
c. Severe neutropenia
d. Arthritis
Pharmacology Weekly, Inc. is an accredited provider for continuing medical education (CME) by the American Academy of Continuing Medical Education (AACME) and this newsletter is worth 0.25 hours of category 1 CME for those subscribers with access to CE.
Medical Director: Gregory C. McKeever, MD
Editor-in-Chief: Anthony J. Busti, PharmD, BCPS, FAHA
Board Members & Reviewers: Jon Herrington, PharmD, BCOP, BCPS; Jose R. Murillo, Jr., PharmD; Donald S. Nuzum, PharmD; Brooke J. Daves, JD
Disclosures of Conflict of Interest: None
Issue Citation:
Busti AJ, Herrington J, Murillo JR, Nuzum DS, Daves BJ, McKeever GC. How do genetic polymorphisms to UGT1A1*28 increase the risk for life-threatening neutropenia when receiving irinotecan (Camptosar®)? PW Pharmacogenet Newsl 2009;1(4):1-4.
References:
1. Irinotecan (Camptosar®) product package insert. Pfizer and Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. New York, NY. July 2008. Last accessed on 1-27-09: Click here for link
2. Innocent F, Undevia SD, Iyer L et al. Genetic variants in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene predict risk of severe neutropenia of irinotecan. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1382-8. PubMed
3. Leiberman M, Marks AD, eds. Mark's Basic Medical Biochemistry A Clinical Approach. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009:479-566.
4. Kawato Y, Aonuma M, Hirota Y et al. Intracellular roles of SN-38, a metabolite of the camptothecin derivative CPT-11, in the antitumor effect of CPT-11. Cancer Res 1991;51:4187. PubMed
5. Sampietro M, Iolascon A. Molecular pathology of Crigler-Najjar type I and II and Gilbert's syndrome. Haematologica 1999;84:150-7. PubMed
6. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Guidelines for the treatment of colon cancer. Last accessed on 1-29-2009. NCCN
7. Beutler E, Gelbart T, Demina A. Racial variability in the UDP-glucuronosyltrasnferase1 (UGT1A1) promoter: a balanced polymorphism for regulation of bilirubin metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:8170-4. PubMed
8. Food and Drug Administration. FDA News. August 22, 2005. Last accessed on 1-27-09: FDA
9. Patterson, RM, Hoyle PC, Editorial Staff of the Publishers of Lawyers' Medical Cyclopedia eds. Drugs in Litigation: Damage Awards Involving Prescription and Nonprescription Drugs. 2008 Edition. LexisNexis. San Francisco, CA.
©2009 Pharmacology Weekly, Inc.
P.O. Box 719
Salado, Texas 76571
www.pharmacologyweekly.com
All rights reserved. Pharmacology Weekly, Inc. is a Texas corporation, advised by healthcare providers who provide unbiased education regarding the relevance of pharmacology in generally accepted practices. This newsletter is sent out to active subscribers weekly, and any and all use of this newsletter is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Pharmacology Weekly, as set forth on the pharmacologyweekly.com website. If you are receiving this newsletter without a subscription, such transmission to you is in violation of such Terms and Conditions, and the sender could be subject to civil liability for such violation of Pharmacology Weekly's intellectual property rights. Please notify Pharmacology Weekly immediately of such person's violation of the Terms and Conditions. You, too, may be subject to such civil liability should you continue to receive such newsletters without purchasing a subscription or should you forward this newsletter to someone else.
No part of this material may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any way whatsoever without written permission from the President of Pharmacology Weekly. The editors rely primarily on peer-reviewed, published medical information and on the opinions of the editorial staff and independent peer-reviewers. All education and recommendations are considered to be educational and not meant to apply to specific patients. The above information should be used appropriately in the context of the provider's legal role as a healthcare provider in their respective state or country. Pharmacology Weekly does not accept responsibility for the application of this information in direct or indirect patient care. It is the responsibility of the healthcare provider to ascertain the Food and Drug Administration status of each drug and to check the product information provided by the manufacturer of each drug for any changes. The editors and authors have made every effort to provide accurate and complete information and shall not be held responsible for any damage from any error, possible omission, or inaccuracy. To the extent this newsletter provides information on legal issues, it is not intended to provide advice on any specific legal matter or factual situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
Copyright 2012 Pharmacology Weekly, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |